Electric power generation, tidal · Wisconsin

Burlington Service Center

Burlington, WI · ~59 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Burlington Service Center runs at 228% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, tidal workplace, earning a grade F.

Burlington Service Center: 2.7 TCR = 228% of Electric power generation, tidal BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Burlington Service Center safety composite

Burlington Service Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Burlington Service Center: 0.0 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 7.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Burlington Service Center's TCR rose 3.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221118 · Burlington, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.7 · 228% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/14
  • PHOTO NorthEast C/O and Di…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NorthEast C/O and DistColl - Bld: 6232 - 01 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Burlington Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Burlington Service Center averages 2.7 TCR (228% of the Electric power generation, tidal BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Burlington Service Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Burlington Service Center falls in its industry

84 Electric power generation, tid establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 14 Electric power generation, tid employers in Wisconsin.

Burlington Service Center (59 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Burlington Service Center
Burlington Service Center (59 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Burlington Service Center has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, tidal median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 0.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.9 3.3 3 0 0
2020 3.5 0.0 2 0 0
2019 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2018 7.7 5.8 4 0 0
2017 3.3 1.6 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221118 · WI · Burlington

84 Electric power generation, tidal employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 53 employers in Burlington, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NorthEast C/O and DistColl - Bld: 6232 - 01 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Snohomish County PUD #1 - Electric Building 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NORTHEAST C&O - 1 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kearny - Bld: 5362 - 01 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Insight FS - Antigo 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northland Buildings Inc 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE NCC Fond du Lac 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Appleton, WI HVAC 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora Memorial Hospital of Burlington 488 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle 452 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle - Burlington 404 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ardagh Glass Inc Burlington 377 FTE
NAT-TCR Wheeling-Nippon Steel 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Finishing Touch Millwork, Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hometown Mechanical 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Angels Baseball LP 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Toshiba Business Solutions - Charlotte 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rouses Market #12 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE 8007 Elston 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairchild Airforce Base Custodial Grounds 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.