Amusement parks (e.g., theme, water) · Michigan

Soaring Eagle Water Park & Hotel

Mt. Pleasant, MI · ~197 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Soaring Eagle Water Park & Hotel runs at 280% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Amusement parks (e.g., theme, water) workplace, earning a grade F.

Soaring Eagle Water Park & Hotel: 8.7 TCR = 280% of Amusement parks (e.g., theme, water) BLS 3.1 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Soaring Eagle Water Park & Hotel safety composite

Soaring Eagle Water Park & Hotel scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2016→2024

Soaring Eagle Water Park & Hotel injury rate improved

Soaring Eagle Water Park & Hotel's TCR fell 3.9 from 13.4 in 2016 to 9.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 13.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.4 · 2017=11.2 · 2018=6.9 · 2019=6.0 · 2020=7.0 · 2021=8.1 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=9.3 · 2024=9.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 713110 · Mt. Pleasant, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.7 · 280% of ind

  • DART 9.5 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO Wild Adventures
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 104 inj
  • SIZE ~197 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wild Adventures (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Soaring Eagle Water Park & Hotel in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Soaring Eagle Water Park & Hotel averages 8.7 TCR (280% of the Amusement parks (e.g., theme, water) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Soaring Eagle Water Park & Hotel TCR series: 2016=13.4 · 2017=11.2 · 2018=6.9 · 2019=6 · 2020=7 · 2021=8.1 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=9.3 · 2024=9.5 · BLS 3.1

Where Soaring Eagle Water Park & Hotel falls in its industry

296 Amusement parks (e.g., theme, establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Amusement parks (e.g., theme, employers in Michigan.

Soaring Eagle Water Park & Hotel (197 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 197 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 010,00020,00030,00040,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Soaring Eagle Water Park & Hotel
Soaring Eagle Water Park & Hotel (197 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 197 employees and a TCR of 6.3

Soaring Eagle Water Park & Hotel has more employees than the Amusement parks (e.g., theme, water) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.5 9.5 8 0 0
2023 9.3 6.5 10 0 0
2022 6.9 6.3 11 0 0
2021 8.1 8.1 7 3 0
2020 7.0 4.2 10 0 0
2019 6.0 4.8 10 0 0
2018 6.9 5.8 12 0 0
2017 11.2 7.5 15 0 0
2016 13.4 11.5 21 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

713110 · MI · Mt. Pleasant

296 Amusement parks (e.g., theme, water) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 42 employers in Mt. Pleasant, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wild Adventures 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR GRAND PRIX TAMPA, LLC 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sandcastle 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parks, Recreation and Community Facilities H420 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Michigan Regional Office - Bahou 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE ITC Operations-219 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE Westlake Pipe & Fittings 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rayconnect Inc. 197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort 2,199 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLaren Central Michigan 582 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delfield 463 FTE
CITY-NEAR J Ranck Electric, Inc. 298 FTE
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 128 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Handy Art, Inc. 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Professional Landscaping 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Wicks Pies Inc. 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Holyoke Massachusetts 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hopewell 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oasis Lifestyle LLC 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hope Global 197 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.