Janitorial Services · Florida

Sodexo at Holmes Regional Med Ctr Evs

Melbourne, FL · ~78 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Holmes Regional Med Ctr Evs runs at 255% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Janitorial Services workplace, earning a grade F.

Sodexo at Holmes Regional Med Ctr Evs: 11.5 TCR = 255% of Janitorial Services BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Holmes Regional Med Ctr Evs safety composite

Sodexo at Holmes Regional Med Ctr Evs scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−49.8

2017→2024

Sodexo at Holmes Regional Med Ctr Evs injury rate improved

Sodexo at Holmes Regional Med Ctr Evs's TCR fell 49.8 from 49.8 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 49.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=49.8 · 2018=19.3 · 2019=11.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Melbourne, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.5 · 255% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #278/292
  • PHOTO Luke
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Luke (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Holmes Regional Med Ctr Evs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Holmes Regional Med Ctr Evs averages 11.5 TCR (255% of the Janitorial Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Holmes Regional Med Ctr Evs TCR series: 2017=49.8 · 2018=19.3 · 2019=11.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Sodexo at Holmes Regional Med Ctr Evs falls in its industry

4,064 Janitorial Services establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #278 safest of 292 Janitorial Services employers in Florida.

Sodexo at Holmes Regional Med Ctr Evs (78 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Holmes Regional Med Ctr Evs
Sodexo at Holmes Regional Med Ctr Evs (78 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sodexo at Holmes Regional Med Ctr Evs has more employees than the Janitorial Services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 11.3 3.8 6 0 0
2018 19.3 5.5 7 0 0
2017 49.8 33.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · FL · Melbourne

4,064 Janitorial Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 305 employers in Melbourne, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Luke 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSSI / SIMMONS FOODS INC. - VAN BUREN COOK 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Newark Liberty International Airport 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 8072 Tuscarora SD EVS 11.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Columbia Care Florida LLC.-Lakeland 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE System Headquarters 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE HO1 Gulfstream Service Center 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE One Pasco Center 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGAS-A458 4,719 FTE
CITY-NEAR HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nextech HVACR 2,358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health First Medical Group 1,787 FTE
NAT-TCR Lyons & Hohl Paving Contractors 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Orijin Stone 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Viewpointe 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0093 Tempe 11.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE S03175 - WM Toms River Hauling 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clark and Riggs Printing Inc 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE CW Young Construction, LP 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE S05208 - Chardon Hauling 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.