Amusement and Theme Parks · California

Universal Parks and Resorts : USH/CW

Universal City, CA · ~7,590 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Universal Parks and Resorts : USH/CW runs at 179% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Amusement and Theme Parks workplace, earning a grade D.

Universal Parks and Resorts : USH/CW: 5.5 TCR = 179% of Amusement and Theme Parks BLS 3.1 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Universal Parks and Resorts : USH/CW safety composite

Universal Parks and Resorts : USH/CW scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Universal Parks and Resorts : USH/CW: 3.9 → 8.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 8.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.1× in 2022

Universal Parks and Resorts : USH/CW's TCR rose 4.5 from 3.9 in 2017 to 8.4 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 713110 · Universal City, CA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 179% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #13/30
  • PHOTO Oklahoma State Fair …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 903 inj
  • SIZE ~7,590 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oklahoma State Fair Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Universal Parks and Resorts : USH/CW in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Universal Parks and Resorts : USH/CW averages 5.5 TCR (179% of the Amusement and Theme Parks BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Universal Parks and Resorts : USH/CW TCR series: 2017=3.9 · 2019=4.3 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=8.4 · BLS 3.1

Where Universal Parks and Resorts : USH/CW falls in its industry

296 Amusement and Theme Parks establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 30 Amusement and Theme Parks employers in California.

Universal Parks and Resorts : USH/CW (7,590 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 197 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 010,00020,00030,00040,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Universal Parks and Resorts : USH/CW
Universal Parks and Resorts : USH/CW (7,590 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 197 employees and a TCR of 6.3

Universal Parks and Resorts : USH/CW has more employees than the Amusement and Theme Parks median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.4 6.1 322 75 0
2021 5.6 4.0 146 34 0
2019 4.3 3.7 228 0 0
2017 3.9 3.0 207 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

713110 · CA · Universal City

296 Amusement and Theme Parks employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 12 employers in Universal City, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oklahoma State Fair Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 831 N Central Expressway, LLC 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silver Dollar City LLC 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hershey Entertainment Complex 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE County of Fresno 7,553 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crown Building Maintenance Company, Inc. 7,647 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Hope 7,443 FTE
STATE-SIZE Los Angeles General Medical Center - Main Campus 7,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal City Studios 9,056 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hilton Universal/ Los Angeles 377 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sheraton Universal Hotel 319 FTE
CITY-NEAR Network News : Los Angeles 162 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Imagine Schools Facilities 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Miles Sand & Gravel Company 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Aero Tech, LLC 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Summerfield Estates 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center 7,587 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kansas City Assembly 7,642 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Metro 7,525 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mass General Brigham Inc 7,655 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.