Food Service Contractors · Pennsylvania

Sodexo at Manorcare Sinking Spring

Sinking Spring, PA · ~31 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Manorcare Sinking Spring runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Sodexo at Manorcare Sinking Spring: 1.1 TCR = 35% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Manorcare Sinking Spring safety composite

Sodexo at Manorcare Sinking Spring scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sodexo at Manorcare Sinking Spring held a steady TCR band

Sodexo at Manorcare Sinking Spring's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Sinking Spring, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #34/463
  • PHOTO OCHSNER MED BATON RO…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OCHSNER MED BATON ROUGE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Manorcare Sinking Spring in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Manorcare Sinking Spring averages 1.1 TCR (35% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Manorcare Sinking Spring TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Manorcare Sinking Spring falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 463 Food Service Contractors employers in Pennsylvania.

Sodexo at Manorcare Sinking Spring (31 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Manorcare Sinking Spring
Sodexo at Manorcare Sinking Spring (31 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Manorcare Sinking Spring has fewer employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.3 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · PA · Sinking Spring

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 21 employers in Sinking Spring, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OCHSNER MED BATON ROUGE 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT UNITED CLUB RDU PER PAX 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7861-PDLLC-FRANKLIN COLLEGE 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NORTH SHORE 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spawn Plant 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Caputo & Guest Mushrooms 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE COLSC Cocalico Service Center 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenixville Service Building 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alcon Precision Device - West 968 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alcon Sinking Spring 944 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1717 LOWE S OF S. READING PA 182 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2807-1717 171 FTE
NAT-TCR Houma North Ramp 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 43191n - Paducah Bin 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Webb Wheel Products - Cullman AL 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CTS Dallas 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jensen Beach 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Houghton College Facilities 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Hca-Pulaski Community Hospital 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arbor - Sycamore Sd 427 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.