Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Solstice Senior Living at Lodi

Lodi, CA · ~35 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Solstice Senior Living at Lodi runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Solstice Senior Living at Lodi: 1.3 TCR = 34% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Solstice Senior Living at Lodi safety composite

Solstice Senior Living at Lodi scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Solstice Senior Living at Lodi: 0.0 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2021

Solstice Senior Living at Lodi's TCR rose 3.1 from 0.0 in 2018 to 3.1 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Lodi, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/635
  • PHOTO Orchard Park of Kyle
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Orchard Park of Kyle (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Solstice Senior Living at Lodi in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Solstice Senior Living at Lodi averages 1.3 TCR (34% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Solstice Senior Living at Lodi TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2 · 2021=3.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Solstice Senior Living at Lodi falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Solstice Senior Living at Lodi (35 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Solstice Senior Living at Lodi
Solstice Senior Living at Lodi (35 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Solstice Senior Living at Lodi has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.0 2.0 0 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Lodi

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 140 employers in Lodi, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Orchard Park of Kyle 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Layton Terrace 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Texarkana 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Lakewood AL/MC (CO) 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 4769-846-WILLIAMS SONOMA 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA - Scotts Valley, 106 Whispering Pines Dr 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE WCA Ventura 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE SeaQuest Folsom LLC 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Perez Farming Services Inc. 1,145 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9292-AHLM001 - HOSPITAL 1,030 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-223 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 592 890 FTE
NAT-TCR Intermodal Cartage Co. - Haslet 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pa058-Yapi-Dauphin County Bh, Pa058 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Supply Chain : Additive Technology Center 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Northeast Branch 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Solstice Senior Living at Fairport 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE 032/Tempe 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rinker INDCP3 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mcgill Brothers 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.