Water treatment and distribution · California

Soto Street Facility

Los Angeles, CA · ~35 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Soto Street Facility runs at 1012% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water treatment and distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

Soto Street Facility: 12.1 TCR = 1012% of Water treatment and distribution BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Soto Street Facility safety composite

Soto Street Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.1

2017→2024

Soto Street Facility injury rate improved

Soto Street Facility's TCR fell 16.1 from 21.8 in 2017 to 5.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 24.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=21.8 · 2018=24.0 · 2019=17.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=10.1 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=14.8 · 2024=5.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Los Angeles, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.1 · 1012% of ind

  • DART 5.8 DART
  • RANK #162/176
  • PHOTO Darlington County Wa…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Darlington County Water & Sewer Authority (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Soto Street Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Soto Street Facility averages 12.1 TCR (1012% of the Water treatment and distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Soto Street Facility TCR series: 2017=21.8 · 2018=24 · 2019=17.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=10.1 · 2022=3 · 2023=14.8 · 2024=5.8 · BLS 1.2

Where Soto Street Facility falls in its industry

727 Water treatment and distributi establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #162 safest of 176 Water treatment and distributi employers in California.

Soto Street Facility (35 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Soto Street Facility
Soto Street Facility (35 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Soto Street Facility has fewer employees than the Water treatment and distribution median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2023 14.8 8.9 5 0 0
2022 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2021 10.1 10.1 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 17.7 14.1 5 0 0
2018 24.0 13.7 6 1 0
2017 21.8 10.9 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · CA · Los Angeles

727 Water treatment and distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Darlington County Water & Sewer Authority 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Water & Sewer - Spring St. 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Works City of Wyoming 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Chicago - Department of Water Management - 1424 W Pershing Rd 12.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION FABRICATION/CARPENTRY/PAINTING/ELECTRIC/PIPE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meek Ranches LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dresick Farms, Inc. - Farm 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolfsen Inc 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Hose/Conveyors Inc. 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Orchard Hill Operator LLC 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Van Dellen Steel Inc. 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Masonry 12.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE City Hall 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gulf Ice Systems, Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE US Gyspum Delavan 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE At Home Stores #172 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.