Packaging services (except packing and crating for transportation) · North Carolina

South Atlantic Packaging - NC

Winston-Salem, NC · ~379 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

South Atlantic Packaging - NC runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Packaging services (except packing and crating for transportation) workplace, earning a grade A.

South Atlantic Packaging - NC: 0.9 TCR = 35% of Packaging services (except packing and crating for transportation) BLS 2.6 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

South Atlantic Packaging - NC safety composite

South Atlantic Packaging - NC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

South Atlantic Packaging - NC held a steady TCR band

South Atlantic Packaging - NC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561910 · Winston-Salem, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/14
  • PHOTO CLINICAL SUPPLIES MA…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~379 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CLINICAL SUPPLIES MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

South Atlantic Packaging - NC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows South Atlantic Packaging - NC averages 0.9 TCR (35% of the Packaging services (except packing and crating for transportation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

South Atlantic Packaging - NC TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.6

Where South Atlantic Packaging - NC falls in its industry

228 Packaging services (except pac establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 14 Packaging services (except pac employers in North Carolina.

South Atlantic Packaging - NC (379 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate South Atlantic Packaging - NC
South Atlantic Packaging - NC (379 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

South Atlantic Packaging - NC has more employees than the Packaging services (except packing and c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2022 4.1 3.2 14 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561910 · NC · Winston-Salem

228 Packaging services (except packing and crating for transportation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 234 employers in Winston-Salem, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CLINICAL SUPPLIES MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS, INC. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Almac Clinical Services 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PBC - PSP Eldo 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Menasha Packaging Company - Columbus 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Plasticard Locktech International Asheville 379 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1036 379 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1034 379 FTE
STATE-SIZE Technimark LLc - Plant 2 378 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center 4,906 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Budd Group Janitorial 4,414 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reynolds American Inc. Trade Marketing Services 2,061 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reynolds Marketing Services Company 1,600 FTE
NAT-TCR Schust Development, Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Maxwell Service Center 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Allegheny Construction Specialties 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR McIntosh Distribution 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Radial 379 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Orleans East Hospital 379 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2340 - Burnsville 379 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bristol-Myers Squibb Manufacturing Company 379 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.