Irrigation system operation · California

South Feather Water and Power Agency

Oroville, CA · ~58 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

South Feather Water and Power Agency runs at 151% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Irrigation system operation workplace, earning a grade D.

South Feather Water and Power Agency: 1.8 TCR = 151% of Irrigation system operation BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

South Feather Water and Power Agency safety composite

South Feather Water and Power Agency scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

South Feather Water and Power Agency held a steady TCR band

South Feather Water and Power Agency's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=3.8 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Oroville, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.8 · 151% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/176
  • PHOTO Eastern Municipal Wa…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eastern Municipal Water District (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

South Feather Water and Power Agency in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows South Feather Water and Power Agency averages 1.8 TCR (151% of the Irrigation system operation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

South Feather Water and Power Agency TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=3.8 · 2022=2 · 2023=0 · BLS 1.2

Where South Feather Water and Power Agency falls in its industry

727 Irrigation system operation establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 176 Irrigation system operation employers in California.

South Feather Water and Power Agency (58 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate South Feather Water and Power Agency
South Feather Water and Power Agency (58 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

South Feather Water and Power Agency has more employees than the Irrigation system operation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.0 0.0 0 1 0
2020 3.8 1.9 2 0 0
2019 3.2 1.6 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · CA · Oroville

727 Irrigation system operation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 79 employers in Oroville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eastern Municipal Water District 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Haworth, NJ 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Illinois American Water (Chicago Metro) 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mammoth Community Water District 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE S & R Farm Labor Contractor 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE RANCHO DEL MAR, INC. 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Laurel Labor Services 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Juan Briones 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 66 2,360 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oroville Hospital 1,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR Butte-Glenn Community College District 1,344 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oroville Hospital Post Acute Center 1,340 FTE
NAT-TCR Smith Road - Ronkonko 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Nitrogen Gas Products Brecksville Division 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 200 Community Dr 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR C&E Industrial Services Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE D&W Fine Pack, LLC 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Denver Intermodal Express Inc 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kycovi-Zp0-Nky Covington 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE UI 8401 (SRS Utah - F) 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.