Skilled nursing facilities · Alabama

South Haven Health & Rehabilitation

Hoover, AL · ~108 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

South Haven Health & Rehabilitation runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

South Haven Health & Rehabilitation: 3.0 TCR = 46% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

South Haven Health & Rehabilitation safety composite

South Haven Health & Rehabilitation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

South Haven Health & Rehabilitation: 1.0 → 61.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 61.5 TCR · DART/TCR 20.34× in 2020

South Haven Health & Rehabilitation's TCR rose 60.6 from 1.0 in 2018 to 61.5 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 20.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Hoover, AL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 3.0 · 46% of ind

  • DART 60.4 DART
  • RANK #30/269
  • PHOTO Jefferson Nursing an…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~108 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jefferson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

South Haven Health & Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows South Haven Health & Rehabilitation averages 3.0 TCR (46% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

South Haven Health & Rehabilitation TCR series: 2018=1 · 2019=5 · 2020=61.5 · BLS 6.5

Where South Haven Health & Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 269 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Alabama.

South Haven Health & Rehabilitation (108 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate South Haven Health & Rehabilitation
South Haven Health & Rehabilitation (108 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

South Haven Health & Rehabilitation has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 61.5 60.4 1 54 0
2019 5.0 1.0 5 0 0
2018 1.0 1.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · AL · Hoover

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 82 employers in Hoover, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jefferson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eagle Peak LTC Group, LLC d/b/a Westwood Hills Nursing & Rehabilitation 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orchard Grove 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Convalescent Center 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cullman Electric Cooperative 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Contractors, Inc. - Mitisubishi 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE McCartney Construction Company Inc 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mobile, AL - Jackson, MS HVAC 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR BRHMALDC 858 FTE
CITY-NEAR BRHMALDC - AT&T Mobility Services LLC 712 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1229 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2111 344 FTE
NAT-TCR DGS Aviation Services : JAX - Jacksonville 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR DGS Aviation Services : COS - Colorado Springs 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR New London-Spicer High School 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ashley Furniture Homestore- Greenwood 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gunnebo Industries 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fl - Winkler Court, LLC 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Warehouse 21/HQ 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Klauer Manufacturing Company - Roosevelt Plant 108 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.