Natural gas distribution systems · New Jersey

South Jersey Gas Glassboro

Glassboro, NJ · ~73 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

South Jersey Gas Glassboro runs at 442% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Natural gas distribution systems workplace, earning a grade F.

South Jersey Gas Glassboro: 5.3 TCR = 442% of Natural gas distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

South Jersey Gas Glassboro safety composite

South Jersey Gas Glassboro scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.9

2016→2021

South Jersey Gas Glassboro injury rate improved

South Jersey Gas Glassboro's TCR fell 10.9 from 12.4 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.4 · 2017=7.5 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221210 · Glassboro, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.3 · 442% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #25/28
  • PHOTO BEAUMONT STATION -15
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BEAUMONT STATION -15 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

South Jersey Gas Glassboro in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows South Jersey Gas Glassboro averages 5.3 TCR (442% of the Natural gas distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

South Jersey Gas Glassboro TCR series: 2016=12.4 · 2017=7.5 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=1.5 · BLS 1.2

Where South Jersey Gas Glassboro falls in its industry

1,153 Natural gas distribution syste establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 28 Natural gas distribution syste employers in New Jersey.

South Jersey Gas Glassboro (73 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate South Jersey Gas Glassboro
South Jersey Gas Glassboro (73 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6

South Jersey Gas Glassboro has more employees than the Natural gas distribution systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2020 6.3 3.1 4 0 0
2019 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2018 2.5 1.3 2 0 0
2017 7.5 4.5 5 0 0
2016 12.4 8.7 7 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221210 · NJ · Glassboro

1,153 Natural gas distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 30 employers in Glassboro, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BEAUMONT STATION -15 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metro Operations Center 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 939-NiSource-Buena Vista VA-Opr Ctr 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Enbridge St. Lawrence Gas - Massena 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE NA-US-NJ-Blackwood-Lower Landing Road 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lucas Construction Group, Inc. 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.E. PIERSON CONSTRUCTION - DE 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Propel Consulting Group LLC dba Roofco Group 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ellis Plant 324 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Jersey Gas: Glassboro 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACE-Glassboro Operations 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR Demountable Concepts, Inc. 84 FTE
NAT-TCR 166027-Palatine Il P&Dc 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR OJ Insulation #872 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilton Garden Inn Pittsburgh University Place 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR CNY Fabrication LLC 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Construction Administration 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regency Care of Rogue Valley 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Doubletree Whittier Los Angeles 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy Life of AL 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.