Electric power generation, nuclear · Texas

South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company

Wadsworth, TX · ~1,118 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, nuclear workplace, earning a grade A.

South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company: 0.1 TCR = 7% of Electric power generation, nuclear BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company safety composite

South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company held a steady TCR band

South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=0.2 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221113 · Wadsworth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 7% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK P86
  • PHOTO Nextera Energy Point…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~1,118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nextera Energy Point Beach Nuclear Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company averages 0.1 TCR (7% of the Electric power generation, nuclear BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=0.2 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.2 · BLS 1.2

Where South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company falls in its industry

80 Electric power generation, nuc establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company (1,118 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0123 Average employees Total Case Rate South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company
South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company (1,118 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2

South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company has more employees than the Electric power generation, nuclear median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.2 0.1 1 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.2 0.1 2 0 0
2020 0.2 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.2 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221113 · TX · Wadsworth

80 Electric power generation, nuclear employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nextera Energy Point Beach Nuclear Plant 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MILLSTONE NUC 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Susquehanna Nuclear 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beaver Valley 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dashiell/Dacon Corporation 1,118 FTE
STATE-SIZE QVC San Antonio, LLC 1,118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Starcon @ ECI/Exxon Baytown 1,119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Waco Processing 1,119 FTE
NAT-TCR Waveland Services Inc. 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Savant Systems, Inc 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR medtronic mounds view campus 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Battle Creek HQ Corporate Office 1,118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Suntec Concrete - Arizona 1,118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - MEM5 1,118 FTE
NAT-SIZE FANUC America Corporation - Rochester Hills 1,118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.