Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) · Georgia

Southeastern Paper Group - Atlanta

College Park, GA · ~104 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southeastern Paper Group - Atlanta runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) workplace, earning a grade B.

Southeastern Paper Group - Atlanta: 4.6 TCR = 79% of Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southeastern Paper Group - Atlanta safety composite

Southeastern Paper Group - Atlanta scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Southeastern Paper Group - Atlanta: 4.2 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.09× in 2024

Southeastern Paper Group - Atlanta's TCR rose 0.8 from 4.2 in 2023 to 5.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493190 · College Park, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.6 · 79% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #30/38
  • PHOTO Plant DY
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plant DY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Southeastern Paper Group - Atlanta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southeastern Paper Group - Atlanta averages 4.6 TCR (79% of the Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southeastern Paper Group - Atlanta TCR series: 2023=4.2 · 2024=5 · BLS 5.8

Where Southeastern Paper Group - Atlanta falls in its industry

453 Warehousing (except farm produ establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 38 Warehousing (except farm produ employers in Georgia.

Southeastern Paper Group - Atlanta (104 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Southeastern Paper Group - Atlanta
Southeastern Paper Group - Atlanta (104 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Southeastern Paper Group - Atlanta has more employees than the Warehousing (except farm products, gener median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 5.0 5 0 0
2023 4.2 3.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493190 · GA · College Park

453 Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 75 employers in College Park, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Plant DY 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AWC Toledo 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakewood 2 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 624 N.E. Jones Industrial Drive Lees Summit MO 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE EC Electric Inc 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Polk County Public Service, Inc. 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woodman Insulation Inc. 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE B&D Concrete Cutting, Inc. 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR COLLEGE PARK 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - Atlanta 1,228 FTE
CITY-NEAR Golden Gate America East LLC. 954 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sysco Atlanta 811 FTE
NAT-TCR Ingram Barge Company Metropolis 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Photo-Sonics, Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cedar Rapids Ia Sales Center 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Embassy Suites by Hilton Tucson East 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Insteel Wire Products FLW 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE 113 City Plaza 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village at Kendallville 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE ST Specialty Foods 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.