Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building · Texas

Southwest General Contractors

Amarillo, TX · ~49 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southwest General Contractors runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade D.

Southwest General Contractors: 4.6 TCR = 158% of Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southwest General Contractors safety composite

Southwest General Contractors scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Southwest General Contractors: 0.0 → 1.7 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 12.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Southwest General Contractors's TCR rose 1.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Amarillo, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 158% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #282/327
  • PHOTO Worcester Eisenbrandt
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Worcester Eisenbrandt (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Southwest General Contractors in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southwest General Contractors averages 4.6 TCR (158% of the Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southwest General Contractors TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=12.7 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=8 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 2.9

Where Southwest General Contractors falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #282 safest of 327 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Texas.

Southwest General Contractors (49 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Southwest General Contractors
Southwest General Contractors (49 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Southwest General Contractors has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation, com median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 3.1 1.5 2 0 0
2022 3.3 1.6 2 0 0
2021 4.8 3.2 3 0 0
2020 8.0 2.0 4 0 0
2019 5.3 0.0 2 0 0
2018 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2017 12.7 10.1 5 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · TX · Amarillo

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 351 employers in Amarillo, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Worcester Eisenbrandt 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arita Poulson General Contracting LLC 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fetters Construction Inc 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Job 2483 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE WOLF CREEK FEED YARD 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Friona Feedyard 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spandet Dairy Friona 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vist Grande Dairy 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amarillo Plant 3,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR BSA Hospital LLC 2,790 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-12071000-12071 1,839 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-30 1,492 FTE
NAT-TCR Holsum Elm Dairy 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ardagh Glass Inc Dunkirk 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR North Charleston CHR 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Stonewall Canyon Winery 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main Office 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE MAPEI CARIBE, Inc. 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE King Machine 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE R+L Carriers - FSO 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.