Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Washington

King Machine

Mukilteo, WA · ~49 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

King Machine runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

King Machine: 2.0 TCR = 62% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

King Machine safety composite

King Machine scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2016→2024

King Machine injury rate improved

King Machine's TCR fell 5.4 from 5.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.4 · 2017=2.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Mukilteo, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/47
  • PHOTO Kinston, North Carol…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kinston, North Carolina (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

King Machine in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows King Machine averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

King Machine TCR series: 2016=5.4 · 2017=2.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where King Machine falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 47 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Washington.

King Machine (49 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate King Machine
King Machine (49 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

King Machine has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.8 0.0 0 2 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 5.4 2.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · WA · Mukilteo

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 37 employers in Mukilteo, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kinston, North Carolina 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ducommun New York 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sterling Engineering 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alken Industries Inc. 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE FRH Dairy 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbia Bean & Produce 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zaldivars 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lockhart Suver 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA012 1,421 FTE
CITY-NEAR Travis Industries 534 FTE
CITY-NEAR Electroimpact Inc. 383 FTE
CITY-NEAR Systima Technologies Inc 322 FTE
NAT-TCR International Sensor Systems, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Store #33 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Wolfskill Energy Center 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Appleton Store 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE MAPEI CARIBE, Inc. 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Decatur 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southwest General Contractors 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE FAA Custodial 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.