Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge · Nevada

Spanish Springs Construction

Sparks, NV · ~113 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spanish Springs Construction runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge workplace, earning a grade A.

Spanish Springs Construction: 1.1 TCR = 38% of Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spanish Springs Construction safety composite

Spanish Springs Construction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2018→2022

Spanish Springs Construction injury rate improved

Spanish Springs Construction's TCR fell 0.7 from 1.6 in 2018 to 0.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.6 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Sparks, NV AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #6/29
  • PHOTO California Departmen…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: California Department of Transportation Facility 198 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

Spanish Springs Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spanish Springs Construction averages 1.1 TCR (38% of the Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spanish Springs Construction TCR series: 2018=1.6 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=0.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Spanish Springs Construction falls in its industry

4,078 Construction management, highw establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nevada alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 29 Construction management, highw employers in Nevada.

Spanish Springs Construction (113 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Spanish Springs Construction
Spanish Springs Construction (113 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Spanish Springs Construction has more employees than the Construction management, highway, road, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2021 2.2 2.2 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.6 1.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · NV · Sparks

4,078 Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 321 employers in Sparks, NV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 198 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Skanska Traylor PNB JV / Portal North Bridge 90008590 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 104910 - LA 1: Port Allen Canal BR REPL 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR KNIFE RIVER - TANGENT DIVISION 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMC Concrete Inc 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE M & H Building Specialties 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE US NV Fernley Plant 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE TAS-RNO 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-NV-Sparks-1-Electric Ave 7,992 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue 7,272 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue-Gigafactory 2,822 FTE
CITY-NEAR NVRNO - RENO HUB 1,324 FTE
NAT-TCR Skeeter Brush Trucks 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kanes Furniture - Dale Mabry Store 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Doss Enterprises L.C. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR AC-School Services, Inc 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Newmark Development 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Northport 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Campana Del Rio 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bloomington TRIA Phys Therapy 113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.