Specialty (except Psychiatric and Substance Abuse) Hospitals · California

Special Programs for Youth (SPY)

San Francisco, CA · ~40 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Special Programs for Youth (SPY) runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Specialty (except Psychiatric and Substance Abuse) Hospitals workplace, earning a grade A.

Special Programs for Youth (SPY): 0.6 TCR = 16% of Specialty (except Psychiatric and Substance Abuse) Hospitals BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Special Programs for Youth (SPY) safety composite

Special Programs for Youth (SPY) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Special Programs for Youth (SPY): 0.0 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 4× in 2023

Special Programs for Youth (SPY)'s TCR rose 2.4 from 0.0 in 2020 to 2.4 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622310 · San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 16% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #1/83
  • PHOTO Karmanos Cancer Inst…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Karmanos Cancer Institute (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Special Programs for Youth (SPY) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Special Programs for Youth (SPY) averages 0.6 TCR (16% of the Specialty (except Psychiatric and Substance Abuse) Hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Special Programs for Youth (SPY) TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Special Programs for Youth (SPY) falls in its industry

1,390 Specialty (except Psychiatric establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 83 Specialty (except Psychiatric employers in California.

Special Programs for Youth (SPY) (40 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Special Programs for Youth (SPY)
Special Programs for Youth (SPY) (40 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Special Programs for Youth (SPY) has fewer employees than the Specialty (except Psychiatric and Substa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622310 · CA · San Francisco

1,390 Specialty (except Psychiatric and Substance Abuse) Hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Karmanos Cancer Institute 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sage IP - Baton Rouge 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2253-H4412 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR KPC Promise Healthcare LLC 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Stackhouse Brothers 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE PISTACHIO HARVESTING, INC. 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Watsonville/San Juan Bautista 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gomez Growers 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Elite Electrical Contractors, Inc 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Equistar Chemicals Lp 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ODF-VA 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mangum Brick 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Supplyone, Inc. Roebuck 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metal Sales MC - Jacksonville 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Portland East 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hayden Homes LLC - WA 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.