Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant · Washington

Spokane Riverside WRF Improvement

Spokane, WA · ~70 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spokane Riverside WRF Improvement runs at 137% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant workplace, earning a grade D.

Spokane Riverside WRF Improvement: 3.8 TCR = 137% of Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spokane Riverside WRF Improvement safety composite

Spokane Riverside WRF Improvement scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2019→2020

Spokane Riverside WRF Improvement injury rate improved

Spokane Riverside WRF Improvement's TCR fell 3.1 from 5.4 in 2019 to 2.3 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.4 · 2020=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Spokane, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.8 · 137% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #11/29
  • PHOTO St. Louis Service Ce…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: St. Louis Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Spokane Riverside WRF Improvement in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spokane Riverside WRF Improvement averages 3.8 TCR (137% of the Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spokane Riverside WRF Improvement TCR series: 2019=5.4 · 2020=2.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Spokane Riverside WRF Improvement falls in its industry

1,614 Construction management, water establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 29 Construction management, water employers in Washington.

Spokane Riverside WRF Improvement (70 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Spokane Riverside WRF Improvement
Spokane Riverside WRF Improvement (70 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Spokane Riverside WRF Improvement has more employees than the Construction management, water and sewag median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2019 5.4 4.1 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · WA · Spokane

1,614 Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 551 employers in Spokane, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR St. Louis Service Center 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Campbell Construction CO., Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Works (old) 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR P. Gioioso and Sons, Inc. 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Assink 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brulotte Farms, Inc. 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE George DeRuyter and Sons Dairy LLC 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Emerald Ag 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000345 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA642 SACRED HEART MEDICAL CENTER-SPOKANE HR 5,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - GEG1 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Spokane 2,451 FTE
NAT-TCR 322 North Glenwood Blvd 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CMCO Lexington Operations 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 10 Brentwood 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mayer Electric Supply Company, Inc. - Greensboro 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE BMC-Rapid City 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Supply Chain Operations Distribution Center / Transformer Shop 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE VAM USA Miller Rd. 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Domestic Uniform Rental 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.