Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Missouri

St. Louis Service Center

St. Louis, MO · ~320 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

St. Louis Service Center runs at 137% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade D.

St. Louis Service Center: 3.8 TCR = 137% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

St. Louis Service Center safety composite

St. Louis Service Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.4

2016→2024

St. Louis Service Center injury rate improved

St. Louis Service Center's TCR fell 8.4 from 10.1 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.1 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · St. Louis, MO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.8 · 137% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #23/27
  • PHOTO Campbell Constructio…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 102 inj
  • SIZE ~320 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Campbell Construction CO., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

St. Louis Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows St. Louis Service Center averages 3.8 TCR (137% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

St. Louis Service Center TCR series: 2016=10.1 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=3 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 2.8

Where St. Louis Service Center falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 27 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Missouri.

St. Louis Service Center (320 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate St. Louis Service Center
St. Louis Service Center (320 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

St. Louis Service Center has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 0.8 4 0 0
2023 3.7 2.6 10 0 0
2022 2.6 1.9 7 0 0
2021 3.0 2.3 9 0 0
2020 3.5 1.4 10 0 0
2019 2.5 0.3 8 0 0
2018 4.2 2.7 14 0 0
2017 3.3 3.0 10 0 0
2016 10.1 7.8 30 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · MO · St. Louis

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Campbell Construction CO., Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spokane Riverside WRF Improvement 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Works (old) 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR P. Gioioso and Sons, Inc. 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE WM 25 320 FTE
STATE-SIZE Witte Bros. Exchange, Inc. 320 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lamar Johnson Collaborative 319 FTE
STATE-SIZE Havco Wood Products, LLC 319 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR ONA Polymers 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Laserflex South Carolina 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Wiese Wichita 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 3086 Keystone Orlando 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mission Bell Winery 320 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holmes Foods Inc 320 FTE
NAT-SIZE Intermountain Electric, Inc. 320 FTE
NAT-SIZE Life EMS Inc.-Kent 320 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.