Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale · Pennsylvania

Spring Glen Fresh Foods

Ephrata, PA · ~133 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spring Glen Fresh Foods runs at 168% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale workplace, earning a grade D.

Spring Glen Fresh Foods: 6.9 TCR = 168% of Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale BLS 4.1 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spring Glen Fresh Foods safety composite

Spring Glen Fresh Foods scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2016→2022

Spring Glen Fresh Foods injury rate improved

Spring Glen Fresh Foods's TCR fell 4.3 from 8.5 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.5 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311991 · Ephrata, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.9 · 168% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #17/23
  • PHOTO Del Real LLC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 70 inj
  • SIZE ~133 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Del Real LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Spring Glen Fresh Foods in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spring Glen Fresh Foods averages 6.9 TCR (168% of the Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spring Glen Fresh Foods TCR series: 2016=8.5 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=4.2 · BLS 4.1

Where Spring Glen Fresh Foods falls in its industry

376 Food, prepared, perishable, pa establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 23 Food, prepared, perishable, pa employers in Pennsylvania.

Spring Glen Fresh Foods (133 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Spring Glen Fresh Foods
Spring Glen Fresh Foods (133 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Spring Glen Fresh Foods has fewer employees than the Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.2 1.4 6 0 0
2021 7.7 3.0 12 1 0
2020 7.1 5.0 10 0 0
2019 7.8 2.6 12 0 0
2018 7.3 3.9 13 0 0
2017 5.7 3.1 7 2 0
2016 8.5 4.2 10 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311991 · PA · Ephrata

376 Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 75 employers in Ephrata, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Del Real LLC 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Etais Food Inc 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sandridge Food Corporation 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR McEntire Produce inc 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Charter Homes & Neighborhoods 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scenic Ridge Company 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction Masters Services, LLC. 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE FM Browns Sons Inc. Sinking Spring 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ephrata Community Hospital 986 FTE
CITY-NEAR Four Seasons Produce, Inc. 553 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2340 366 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2340 354 FTE
NAT-TCR SunPower Corp. - SPNJ2 Cranbury 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 4769-256-Williams Sonoma 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR PAP Louisville 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR HG681 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Suntec Concrete - Colorado 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rocklin Store - 18 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alsana-St Louis 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Villa at City Center 133 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.