Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) · California

Spring Valley

Spring Valley, CA · ~35 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spring Valley runs at 222% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) workplace, earning a grade F.

Spring Valley: 10.0 TCR = 222% of Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spring Valley safety composite

Spring Valley scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Spring Valley: 5.0 → 16.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 17.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.15× in 2024

Spring Valley's TCR rose 11.1 from 5.0 in 2017 to 16.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 17.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Spring Valley, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 222% of ind

  • DART 11.5 DART
  • RANK #333/448
  • PHOTO Russell Landscape Pa…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Russell Landscape Partners- Savannah (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Spring Valley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spring Valley averages 10.0 TCR (222% of the Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spring Valley TCR series: 2017=5 · 2018=6.9 · 2019=3.8 · 2022=17.5 · 2023=10.7 · 2024=16.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Spring Valley falls in its industry

2,875 Tree services (e.g., bracing, establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #333 safest of 448 Tree services (e.g., bracing, employers in California.

Spring Valley (35 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Spring Valley
Spring Valley (35 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Spring Valley has fewer employees than the Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.1 11.5 7 0 0
2023 10.7 10.7 4 0 0
2022 17.5 17.5 4 1 0
2019 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2018 6.9 6.9 3 0 0
2017 5.0 5.0 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · CA · Spring Valley

2,875 Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 56 employers in Spring Valley, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Russell Landscape Partners- Savannah 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR English Gardens Landscape- Pontiac 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Malibu Canyon Landscape & Maintenance Inc. 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5905 - New Jersey Bergen 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION FABRICATION/CARPENTRY/PAINTING/ELECTRIC/PIPE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meek Ranches LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dresick Farms, Inc. - Farm 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolfsen Inc 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 368 1,170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Covenant Living at Mount Miguel 230 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOUNT MIGUEL COVENANT VILLAGE 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Casper Company 180 FTE
NAT-TCR Wisconsin Lions Foundation 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Design Tanks, LLC 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kingman Police Department 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rwm Technologies, LLC 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Maley & Wertz, Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village of Evergreen Park Street Division 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brooksville FL Yard 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shelton WA Yard 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.