Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing · Missouri

St. Charles Stamping

St. Charles, MO · ~50 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

St. Charles Stamping runs at 176% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

St. Charles Stamping: 5.8 TCR = 176% of Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

St. Charles Stamping safety composite

St. Charles Stamping scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

St. Charles Stamping: 3.9 → 7.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 7.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.33× in 2018

St. Charles Stamping's TCR rose 3.8 from 3.9 in 2017 to 7.7 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · St. Charles, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 176% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #6/13
  • PHOTO Accurate Forming LLC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Accurate Forming LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

St. Charles Stamping in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows St. Charles Stamping averages 5.8 TCR (176% of the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

St. Charles Stamping TCR series: 2017=3.9 · 2018=7.7 · BLS 3.3

Where St. Charles Stamping falls in its industry

477 Metal stampings (except automo establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 13 Metal stampings (except automo employers in Missouri.

St. Charles Stamping (50 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate St. Charles Stamping
St. Charles Stamping (50 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

St. Charles Stamping has fewer employees than the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 7.7 1.9 3 1 0
2017 3.9 1.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · MO · St. Charles

477 Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 83 employers in St. Charles, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Accurate Forming LLC 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR WLS Fabricataing Company 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commercial Metal Forming Youngstown 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR G3 Enterprises, Inc. - Closure Division 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Opal-Foods Anderson Farm 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson City 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Meter Services - MO 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE New-Mac Electric Cooperative, Inc. - Neosho, MO 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ameristar Casino Resort Spa 1,420 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph Hospital - St. Charles 1,196 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles 1,149 FTE
CITY-NEAR 004-Nike Air Manufacturing Missouri 770 FTE
NAT-TCR Atrium Post Acute Care of Lancaster 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR BSL/BN Commons AL/ALZ/SNF LLC 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Buffalo 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hom/Ade Foods Inc 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE South Florida 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE HoneywellFL24 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE TN.FRANK.7 - Ricoh Usa, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE GA099 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.