Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Minnesota
St. Paul Branch
St Paul, MN · ~20 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 15.1
- Avg TCR
- 2.1
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
St. Paul Branch runs at 717% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 15.1
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 2.1
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 6
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares St. Paul Branch's OSHA Total Case Rate of 15.1 to the Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark of 2.1 (717% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
St. Paul Branch's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 2.1 industry benchmark.
Where St. Paul Branch falls in its industry
3,014 Heavy machinery and equipment establishmentsSafer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.
Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #57 safest of 59 Heavy machinery and equipment employers in Minnesota.
Trend analysis for St. Paul Branch
Between 2017 and 2018, St. Paul Branch's Total Case Rate improved from 25.3 to 4.8 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 81% decrease across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2018, at a TCR of 4.8, while 2017 saw the highest rate, at 25.3, a spread of 20.5 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, St. Paul Branch recorded 6 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 6 injuries shown on this page for St. Paul Branch are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 811310 - Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2018)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
1 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 41,600 hours worked = 4.81 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| St. Paul Branch (this establishment) | 15.05 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial industry avg | 2.10 | BLS IIF, NAICS 811310 |
| Minnesota state avg (all industries) | 5.18 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by St. Paul Branch to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2018: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 5 reportable incidents · 5 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 25.3 | 25.3 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on St. Paul Branch's reported OSHA injury record versus its Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 717% of the Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services benchmark, St. Paul Branch reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is St. Paul Branch's safety grade?
How many injuries has St. Paul Branch reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Minnesota, and by nearby establishments in St Paul - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~15.1)
Similar size (~20 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.