Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Missouri

State Line Combined Cycle

Joplin, MO · ~28 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

State Line Combined Cycle runs at 192% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade D.

State Line Combined Cycle: 2.3 TCR = 192% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

State Line Combined Cycle safety composite

State Line Combined Cycle scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

State Line Combined Cycle: 0.0 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 7.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

State Line Combined Cycle's TCR rose 3.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Joplin, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.3 · 192% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/42
  • PHOTO Bunkie Service Center
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bunkie Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

State Line Combined Cycle in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows State Line Combined Cycle averages 2.3 TCR (192% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

State Line Combined Cycle TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=7.1 · 2018=6.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 1.2

Where State Line Combined Cycle falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 42 Electric power generation, fos employers in Missouri.

State Line Combined Cycle (28 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate State Line Combined Cycle
State Line Combined Cycle (28 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

State Line Combined Cycle has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2023 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.4 3.2 2 0 0
2017 7.1 3.5 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · MO · Joplin

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 203 employers in Joplin, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bunkie Service Center 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valmont Station 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Asbury Power Station 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mountaineer Plant 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southern Hills 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOPV-SEL-PRAIRIE VIEW - LAYING HEN' 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Substations - South 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN TRANSMISSION - Transmission - UE 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Freeman Health System 3,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL JOPLIN 1,561 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marmic Fire & Safety Company Inc. 875 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jasper Products, LLC 782 FTE
NAT-TCR Royal Baths Manufacturing, LTD. - Chrisman Facility 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR C.J. Hesse, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 400-Dallas 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Salk Institute for Biological Studies 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Columbus 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Lafayette 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE AE Products, Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Cold Forge 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.