Aggregate spreaders manufacturing · Minnesota

Stepp Manufacturing Co., Inc.

North Branch, MN · ~47 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stepp Manufacturing Co., Inc. runs at 294% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Aggregate spreaders manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Stepp Manufacturing Co., Inc.: 9.7 TCR = 294% of Aggregate spreaders manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stepp Manufacturing Co., Inc. safety composite

Stepp Manufacturing Co., Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.5

2017→2023

Stepp Manufacturing Co., Inc. injury rate improved

Stepp Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s TCR fell 8.5 from 18.6 in 2017 to 10.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 18.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=18.6 · 2018=11.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=9.5 · 2022=13.4 · 2023=10.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333120 · North Branch, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.7 · 294% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #14/21
  • PHOTO Cemen Tech, Inc
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cemen Tech, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Stepp Manufacturing Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stepp Manufacturing Co., Inc. averages 9.7 TCR (294% of the Aggregate spreaders manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stepp Manufacturing Co., Inc. TCR series: 2017=18.6 · 2018=11.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=9.5 · 2022=13.4 · 2023=10.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Stepp Manufacturing Co., Inc. falls in its industry

400 Aggregate spreaders manufactur establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 21 Aggregate spreaders manufactur employers in Minnesota.

Stepp Manufacturing Co., Inc. (47 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Stepp Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Stepp Manufacturing Co., Inc. (47 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Stepp Manufacturing Co., Inc. has fewer employees than the Aggregate spreaders manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 10.1 4.0 5 0 0
2022 13.4 6.7 6 0 0
2021 9.5 2.4 4 0 0
2020 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 11.9 7.1 5 0 0
2017 18.6 11.6 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333120 · MN · North Branch

400 Aggregate spreaders manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 30 employers in North Branch, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cemen Tech, Inc 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CNH Industrial - Wichita 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saf-T-Cab 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Exodus Global, LLC. 9.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Staples 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Campbell 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willmar Live Haul 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Branch Extrusion - CORP 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Andersen Corporation - North Branch 195 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ecumen North Branch 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR County Market North Branch - 5609 95 FTE
NAT-TCR Bill Nichols State Veterans Home 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Enviro Express Inc 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Wave Division Holdings, LLC-Woodburn 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Belrick Corporation 9.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Anderson Japanese Gardens 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brennstuhl Construction, Inc 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northern Operations Center 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE NorthState - 54 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.