Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Pennsylvania

Sterling Helicopter Croydon

Croydon, PA · ~104 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sterling Helicopter Croydon runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade D.

Sterling Helicopter Croydon: 5.7 TCR = 126% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sterling Helicopter Croydon safety composite

Sterling Helicopter Croydon scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sterling Helicopter Croydon: 2.4 → 9.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 9.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.9× in 2024

Sterling Helicopter Croydon's TCR rose 6.6 from 2.4 in 2023 to 9.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Croydon, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 126% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #12/18
  • PHOTO MHT
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MHT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Sterling Helicopter Croydon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sterling Helicopter Croydon averages 5.7 TCR (126% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sterling Helicopter Croydon TCR series: 2023=2.4 · 2024=9 · BLS 4.5

Where Sterling Helicopter Croydon falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 18 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Pennsylvania.

Sterling Helicopter Croydon (104 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sterling Helicopter Croydon
Sterling Helicopter Croydon (104 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sterling Helicopter Croydon has more employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.0 5.1 7 0 0
2023 2.4 2.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · PA · Croydon

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 26 employers in Croydon, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MHT 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR AeroRepair Corp IN 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SFS Omaha-244OMA 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SJU 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Soergel Orchards2 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar - Philadelphia 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charles J. Merlo Inc. 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Golden Eagle Construction Co. Inc. 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henkels & McCoy, Inc. - Pipeline Division 374 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zober Industries Inc. 182 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHILADELPHIA PA - 073 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR Croydon Emulsions 115 FTE
NAT-TCR HMBL Carpinteria 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Stafford Springs 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Rollin R Enterprises Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bird & Cronin LLC 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Precision Cable Assemblies 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Control Solutions Inc 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heights Tower Service 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gage Products 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.