Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Stewart Amos Steel Inc.

Harrisburg, PA · ~54 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stewart Amos Steel Inc. runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Stewart Amos Steel Inc.: 3.8 TCR = 114% of Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stewart Amos Steel Inc. safety composite

Stewart Amos Steel Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2017→2024

Stewart Amos Steel Inc. injury rate improved

Stewart Amos Steel Inc.'s TCR fell 5.3 from 5.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.3 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=7.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Harrisburg, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 114% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/91
  • PHOTO Global Fab Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Global Fab Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Stewart Amos Steel Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stewart Amos Steel Inc. averages 3.8 TCR (114% of the Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stewart Amos Steel Inc. TCR series: 2017=5.3 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=7.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Stewart Amos Steel Inc. falls in its industry

1,491 Structural steel, fabricated, establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 91 Structural steel, fabricated, employers in Pennsylvania.

Stewart Amos Steel Inc. (54 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Stewart Amos Steel Inc.
Stewart Amos Steel Inc. (54 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Stewart Amos Steel Inc. has more employees than the Structural steel, fabricated, manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 7.2 5.7 5 0 0
2022 6.2 6.2 4 0 0
2021 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2020 6.2 4.7 4 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2017 5.3 3.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · PA · Harrisburg

1,491 Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 362 employers in Harrisburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Global Fab Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SpecSys Inc 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. George Steel LLC 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nucor Harris Rebar Midwest LLC-Marion Ohio 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE TRIPLE-M-FARMS 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scrubgrass Reclamation Company L.P. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 269-NiSource-Washington PA-Service 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wagman Construction Inc. 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Pinnacle Hospitals 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHS/HARRISBURG HOSPITAL 2,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pinnacle Health Medical Services 2,426 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Pinnacle 2,311 FTE
NAT-TCR S04545 - Atlanta East Hauling 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Global Fab Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Casey County Hospital 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Opportunity Partners - Koch Campus 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Village of Bethalto 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ledesma and Meyer 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04213 - WM of Wenatchee 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE One Week Bath, Inc. 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.