Concrete repair · Pennsylvania

Structural Maintenance Systems, Inc.

Malvern, PA · ~24 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Structural Maintenance Systems, Inc. runs at 119% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Concrete repair workplace, earning a grade C.

Structural Maintenance Systems, Inc.: 3.3 TCR = 119% of Concrete repair BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Structural Maintenance Systems, Inc. safety composite

Structural Maintenance Systems, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Structural Maintenance Systems, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Structural Maintenance Systems, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=11.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Malvern, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 119% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/66
  • PHOTO National Polishing S…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: National Polishing System, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Structural Maintenance Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Structural Maintenance Systems, Inc. averages 3.3 TCR (119% of the Concrete repair BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Structural Maintenance Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=11.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Structural Maintenance Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

1,314 Concrete repair establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 66 Concrete repair employers in Pennsylvania.

Structural Maintenance Systems, Inc. (24 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Structural Maintenance Systems, Inc.
Structural Maintenance Systems, Inc. (24 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Structural Maintenance Systems, Inc. has fewer employees than the Concrete repair median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 8.8 4.4 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 11.2 0.0 2 0 0
2019 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · PA · Malvern

1,314 Concrete repair employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 104 employers in Malvern, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR National Polishing System, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR J&M Concrete Contractors / dba Jezowski & Markel Contractors 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Integrated Concrete Construction 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dugan & Meyers 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Avon Heights Mushrooms, Inc. 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waynesburg PA 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty Electric Power LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tenaska Westmoreland Generating Station 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Malvern, PA 5,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint-Gobain North Amerian Headquarters 1,490 FTE
CITY-NEAR Malvern 1,175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Janssen Malvern 1,099 FTE
NAT-TCR Prairie Flower - Home Ranch 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Trudeau's Fence Company, Ltd. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Heavy Duty Rebuilders Supply 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Overmyer Plant 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Thornfield Hall, Inc 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moore Lumber - Ayer Store Location 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE United States Roller Works, Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yutzy Tree Service 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.