Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing · North Carolina

Structural Steel Products Corporation

Clayton, NC · ~89 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Structural Steel Products Corporation runs at 311% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Structural Steel Products Corporation: 10.3 TCR = 311% of Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Structural Steel Products Corporation safety composite

Structural Steel Products Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.1

2016→2020

Structural Steel Products Corporation injury rate improved

Structural Steel Products Corporation's TCR fell 16.1 from 22.2 in 2016 to 6.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 22.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=22.2 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=8.8 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=6.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Clayton, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 311% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #39/41
  • PHOTO 4G Steel Fabrication
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4G Steel Fabrication (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Structural Steel Products Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Structural Steel Products Corporation averages 10.3 TCR (311% of the Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Structural Steel Products Corporation TCR series: 2016=22.2 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=8.8 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=6.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Structural Steel Products Corporation falls in its industry

1,491 Structural steel, fabricated, establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 41 Structural steel, fabricated, employers in North Carolina.

Structural Steel Products Corporation (89 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Structural Steel Products Corporation
Structural Steel Products Corporation (89 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Structural Steel Products Corporation has more employees than the Structural steel, fabricated, manufactur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 6.1 2.4 5 0 0
2019 8.7 3.8 6 1 0
2018 8.8 7.3 6 0 0
2017 5.5 3.3 5 0 0
2016 22.2 13.3 20 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · NC · Clayton

1,491 Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 77 employers in Clayton, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4G Steel Fabrication 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Highway (A Simplex Company) 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jaquith Industries, Inc. 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metal Form 10.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE C.T. Wilson Construction Company, Inc. 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate Office 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kinetic Systems Inc. Durham Office-Shop NC 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cross Technologies Inc Whitsett 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR GRIFOLS THERAPEUTICS LLC (CLAYTON) 1,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR DFP Clayton 808 FTE
CITY-NEAR LSAM DAPI-US 664 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Industries, LP 644 FTE
NAT-TCR FFT Auburn, LLC 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Banning Lewis Ranch 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Curtin Mill 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Brunswick Hospice 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE BWS-Kalihi 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hughson Nut, Inc - Leedom Facility 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spee-Dee Delivery Service, Inc. - Des Moines 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Built-Well Construction Co 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.