Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Florida

STS Aviation Services US

Melbourne, FL · ~363 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

STS Aviation Services US runs at 144% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade D.

STS Aviation Services US: 6.5 TCR = 144% of Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

STS Aviation Services US safety composite

STS Aviation Services US scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

STS Aviation Services US: 4.4 → 8.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.56× in 2024

STS Aviation Services US's TCR rose 4.1 from 4.4 in 2023 to 8.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Melbourne, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.5 · 144% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #119/137
  • PHOTO MCO-GH
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 51 inj
  • SIZE ~363 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MCO-GH (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

STS Aviation Services US in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows STS Aviation Services US averages 6.5 TCR (144% of the Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

STS Aviation Services US TCR series: 2023=4.4 · 2024=8.5 · BLS 4.5

Where STS Aviation Services US falls in its industry

992 Maintenance and repair service establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #119 safest of 137 Maintenance and repair service employers in Florida.

STS Aviation Services US (363 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate STS Aviation Services US
STS Aviation Services US (363 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

STS Aviation Services US has more employees than the Maintenance and repair services, aircraf median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.5 3.6 33 0 0
2023 4.4 3.4 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · FL · Melbourne

992 Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 305 employers in Melbourne, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MCO-GH 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillaero Modification Center 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Aerospace Coatings 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SFS Atlantic City 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 3495-50CA629 363 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3370 363 FTE
STATE-SIZE 174 363 FTE
STATE-SIZE FLDVP - DAVENPORT 363 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGAS-A458 4,719 FTE
CITY-NEAR HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nextech HVACR 2,358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health First Medical Group 1,787 FTE
NAT-TCR St. George Rehabilitation 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Nichols, Long and Moore Construction Corp 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bradford Regional Medical Center 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Cincinnati 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mnmtp - Minneapolis - St Paul Airport 363 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glad Mfg 363 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Stow Company Holland Inc 363 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holy Family Hospital - Haverhill 363 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.