Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Massachusetts

STS Operating - Hope Group

Northborough, MA · ~68 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

STS Operating - Hope Group runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade A.

STS Operating - Hope Group: 0.7 TCR = 32% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

STS Operating - Hope Group safety composite

STS Operating - Hope Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2019→2024

STS Operating - Hope Group injury rate improved

STS Operating - Hope Group's TCR fell 1.3 from 1.3 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.3 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Northborough, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/31
  • PHOTO Chicago
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chicago (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

STS Operating - Hope Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows STS Operating - Hope Group averages 0.7 TCR (32% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

STS Operating - Hope Group TCR series: 2019=1.3 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.1

Where STS Operating - Hope Group falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 31 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in Massachusetts.

STS Operating - Hope Group (68 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate STS Operating - Hope Group
STS Operating - Hope Group (68 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

STS Operating - Hope Group has more employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.7 0.0 2 0 0
2019 1.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MA · Northborough

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 42 employers in Northborough, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chicago 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gregory Poole Lift Systems- Discovery 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR JVIC CATALYST 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MainTech - Indianapolis Mechanical Svc 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE BROCKTON - E ASHLAND ST BLDG-MA07 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perini Management Services, Inc. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Office 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maverick Construction Corp 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR NORTHBORO-MA33 983 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5015 551 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Northborough 058 524 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - OWD5 391 FTE
NAT-TCR Meggitt (Rockmart) Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CPBR Terminal 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 237 - Savannah 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 431 - Minneapolis Fas 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Carfair Composites USA Inc. 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northwoods Mfg Inc 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6730 Redeker Place- Los Angeles area 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raytheon_Dallas_8121 Lemmon Av_TX 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.