Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building · Massachusetts

Suffolk Construction (Boston Ops)

Boston, MA · ~653 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Suffolk Construction (Boston Ops) runs at 3% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade A.

Suffolk Construction (Boston Ops): 0.1 TCR = 3% of Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Suffolk Construction (Boston Ops) safety composite

Suffolk Construction (Boston Ops) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Suffolk Construction (Boston Ops) held a steady TCR band

Suffolk Construction (Boston Ops)'s TCR held near 0.2 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.2 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.0 · 2023=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Boston, MA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 3% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/100
  • PHOTO Gilbane Building Com…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~653 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gilbane Building Company Arizona (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Suffolk Construction (Boston Ops) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Suffolk Construction (Boston Ops) averages 0.1 TCR (3% of the Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Suffolk Construction (Boston Ops) TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0.2 · BLS 2.9

Where Suffolk Construction (Boston Ops) falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 100 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Massachusetts.

Suffolk Construction (Boston Ops) (653 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Suffolk Construction (Boston Ops)
Suffolk Construction (Boston Ops) (653 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Suffolk Construction (Boston Ops) has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation gene median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MA · Boston

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 577 employers in Boston, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gilbane Building Company Arizona 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sachse Construction 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Weitz Company - Florida Office 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clayco Inc 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Biogen - US Field 653 FTE
STATE-SIZE Analogic 8 Centennial Dr Peabody MA 652 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weston & Sampson Engineering, Inc. 652 FTE
STATE-SIZE Venture Community Services 652 FTE
CITY-NEAR Massachusetts General Hospital 26,855 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brigham and Women's Hospital 19,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brigham and Womens Hospital 19,004 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brigham & Women's Hospital 18,260 FTE
NAT-TCR medtronic mounds view campus 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Nibco Whq 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Headquarters 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Experient Inc. - Fenton 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stockton Maintenance Group 653 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moon Township Pd Hq Pa 653 FTE
NAT-SIZE BayCare Medical Services, LLC (4300) 653 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bella Vineyard Ag Services, Inc 653 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.