Endoscopic equipment, electromedical (e.g., bronchoscopes, colonoscopes, cystoscopes), manufacturing · Georgia

Headquarters

Alpharetta, GA · ~1,283 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Headquarters runs at 2% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Endoscopic equipment, electromedical (e.g., bronchoscopes, colonoscopes, cystoscopes), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Headquarters: 0.1 TCR = 2% of Endoscopic equipment, electromedical (e.g., bronchoscopes, colonoscopes, cystoscopes), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Headquarters safety composite

Headquarters scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Headquarters held a steady TCR band

Headquarters's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.1 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.1 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334510 · Alpharetta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 2% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO medtronic mounds vie…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~1,283 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: medtronic mounds view campus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Headquarters in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Headquarters averages 0.1 TCR (2% of the Endoscopic equipment, electromedical (e.g., bronchoscopes, colonoscopes, cystoscopes), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Headquarters TCR series: 2018=0.1 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Headquarters falls in its industry

242 Endoscopic equipment, electrom establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Endoscopic equipment, electrom employers in Georgia.

Headquarters (1,283 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Headquarters
Headquarters (1,283 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Headquarters has more employees than the Endoscopic equipment, electromedical (e. median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.2 0.2 2 0 0
2018 0.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334510 · GA · Alpharetta

242 Endoscopic equipment, electromedical (e.g., bronchoscopes, colonoscopes, cystoscopes), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 329 employers in Alpharetta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR medtronic mounds view campus 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boston Scientific CRM - National Commercial 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teleflex Morrisville 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR GEHC : Waukesha WI (MR), HCS 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE GPC Corporate Office 241 Ralph McGill Boulevard NE Atlanta GA 30308 1,284 FTE
STATE-SIZE Emory Ortho and Spine Hospital - EHC 1,282 FTE
STATE-SIZE GPC Corporate Office - 241 Ralph McGill Boulevard NE Atlanta, GA 30308 1,286 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morehouse School of Medicine 1,279 FTE
CITY-NEAR MarketSource, Inc. 5,905 FTE
CITY-NEAR ALPHARETTA, GA 3,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR LOCATION 20001 2,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS (GAAPR) 1,606 FTE
NAT-TCR Nibco Whq 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Experient Inc. - Fenton 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR medtronic mounds view campus 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fremont 1 1,283 FTE
NAT-SIZE Culver City / Westside 1,282 FTE
NAT-SIZE 826 - EFC4 DeSoto, TX 1,282 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caejs - Western Regional International Air Hub 1,284 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.