Commercial building construction · Massachusetts

Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. National HQs

Name: Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. National HQs Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Boston, MA · ~1,631 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 0.1
Avg TCR: 2.9
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. National HQs runs at 2% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial building construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. National HQs: 0.1 TCR = 2% of Commercial building construction BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. National HQs safety composite

Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. National HQs scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 0.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers
DART rate: D 0.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. National HQs held a steady TCR band

Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. National HQs's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.1 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Boston, MA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 2% of ind

DART 0.1 DART
RANK #1/100
PHOTO International Division
BOOK 2y book
INJ 2 inj
SIZE ~1,631 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: International Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

This site

0.1
International

0.1
W.E. O'Neil Co

0.1
Caddell Constr

0.1
103440 - E130

0.1

What this shows Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. National HQs averages 0.1 TCR (2% of the Commercial building construction BLS benchmark).

Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. National HQs TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0.1 · BLS 2.9

Where Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. National HQs falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 100 Commercial building constructi employers in Massachusetts.

Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. National HQs (1,631 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. National HQs has more employees than the Commercial building construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2020	0.1	0.1	2	0	0
2019	0.0	0.0	0	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MA · Boston

4,692 Commercial building construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 577 employers in Boston, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	International Division	BIRMINGHAM, AL	0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	W.E. O'Neil Construction Co. of California	EL SEGUNDO, CA	0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Caddell Construction Company De LLC	MONTGOMERY, AL	0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	103440 - E130 Seattle to South Bellevue	SEATTLE, WA	0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Brigham & Women's Faulkner Hospital	JAMAICA PLAIN	1,627 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Boston	CHARLESTOWN	1,637 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Northeast Security	WESTWOOD	1,623 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Shire: USA Field/Sales Employees	LEXINGTON	1,615 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Massachusetts General Hospital	Boston	26,855 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Brigham and Women's Hospital	Boston	19,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Brigham and Womens Hospital	Boston	19,004 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Brigham & Women's Hospital	Boston	18,260 FTE
NAT-TCR	Schlumberger Sugar Land Campus North	Sugar Land, TX	0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	JCG Industries Inc	Chicago, IL	0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	ExxonMobil Global Services Company Houston Campus	Spring, TX	0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Corporate Staff Offices	Decatur, IL	0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Broadridge Financial Solutions - Edgewood One	Edgewood, NY	1,631 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Franklin Hospital	Valley Stream, NY	1,632 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Amazon Transportation Services : BFI5	Kent, WA	1,632 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Amzl : Ddt1	Hazel Park, MI	1,632 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.