Cutters, metal milling, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Sumitomo Electric Carbide Manufacturing, Inc.

New Berlin, WI · ~145 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sumitomo Electric Carbide Manufacturing, Inc. runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cutters, metal milling, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Sumitomo Electric Carbide Manufacturing, Inc.: 1.0 TCR = 31% of Cutters, metal milling, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sumitomo Electric Carbide Manufacturing, Inc. safety composite

Sumitomo Electric Carbide Manufacturing, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2017→2022

Sumitomo Electric Carbide Manufacturing, Inc. injury rate improved

Sumitomo Electric Carbide Manufacturing, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.5 from 1.3 in 2017 to 0.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.3 · 2022=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333515 · New Berlin, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #3/15
  • PHOTO Prep Division
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~145 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Prep Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Sumitomo Electric Carbide Manufacturing, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sumitomo Electric Carbide Manufacturing, Inc. averages 1.0 TCR (31% of the Cutters, metal milling, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sumitomo Electric Carbide Manufacturing, Inc. TCR series: 2017=1.3 · 2022=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Sumitomo Electric Carbide Manufacturing, Inc. falls in its industry

221 Cutters, metal milling, manufa establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 15 Cutters, metal milling, manufa employers in Wisconsin.

Sumitomo Electric Carbide Manufacturing, Inc. (145 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sumitomo Electric Carbide Manufacturing, Inc.
Sumitomo Electric Carbide Manufacturing, Inc. (145 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Sumitomo Electric Carbide Manufacturing, Inc. has more employees than the Cutters, metal milling, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2017 1.3 0.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333515 · WI · New Berlin

221 Cutters, metal milling, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 183 employers in New Berlin, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Prep Division 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Swagelok OSM 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LMT Onsrud LP 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MP Tool & Engineering Company 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dairy State Cheese LLC 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE OCONOMOWOC WI PLANT 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silgan Containers Frontier Rd 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stainless Foundry and Engineering inc 145 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pieper Electric, Inc. 1,154 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5531 502 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milwaukee Office 425 FTE
CITY-NEAR KS Energy Services (New Berlin) 411 FTE
NAT-TCR PSSI - 0552 OK Foods Inc. - Reed Lane 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Palmetto 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fl-Dst Acj-130 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1438 - Southeast Huntsville 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hamilton Hotel DC 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Welk Resorts Corporate Office 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE CIRCOR Industrial Valves 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Y Foods, Inc. Ellington 145 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.