Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction · Kansas

Sunflower Wind Project

Name: Sunflower Wind Project Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Peabody, KS · ~64 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 0.0
Avg TCR: 2.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sunflower Wind Project runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Sunflower Wind Project: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sunflower Wind Project safety composite

Sunflower Wind Project scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sunflower Wind Project held a steady TCR band

Sunflower Wind Project's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.0 TCR.

2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Peabody, KS AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #0/10
PHOTO 15-100 IN
BOOK 2y book
INJ 0 inj
SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 15-100 IN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

105185 - IPP R

0.1
103171 - Hunti

0.1
This site

0
15-100 IN

0
Hanwha Q Cells

0

What this shows Sunflower Wind Project averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS benchmark).

Sunflower Wind Project TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Sunflower Wind Project falls in its industry

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geot establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 10 Alternative energy (e.g., geot employers in Kansas.

Sunflower Wind Project (64 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Sunflower Wind Project has fewer employees than the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, oc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2023	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2022	0.0	0.0	0	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · KS · Peabody

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	15-100 IN	REYNOLDS, IN	0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Hanwha Q Cells USA Corp.	IRVINE, CA	0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	105185 - IPP Repowering- 840MW 2x2x1 CC	DELTA, UT	0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project	HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA	0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	OP KGS DIV GO	OVERLAND PARK	64 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Excel Constructors, Inc.	OVERLAND PARK	64 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Bettis Contractors, Inc.	TOPEKA	64 FTE
STATE-SIZE	TK Elevator Lenexa	LENEXA	64 FTE
CITY-NEAR	PEABODY HEALTH & REHAB	Peabody	47 FTE
NAT-TCR	1655 3rd St,San Francisco (MB3	San Francisco, CA	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Carbro Constructors Corp Main	Warren, NJ	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Kinship Pointe Seward	Seward, NE	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Chicago Corporate	Chicago, IL	0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Hornet Steel Buildings, Inc.	Adel, GA	64 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Carey Electric Co	Vandalia, OH	64 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Manistique Community Center	Manistique, MI	64 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Reliable Biopharmaceuticals Corp.	Saint Louis, MO	64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.