Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard · California

Superior Lithographics, Inc.

Los Angeles, CA · ~108 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Superior Lithographics, Inc. runs at 188% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard workplace, earning a grade D.

Superior Lithographics, Inc.: 6.2 TCR = 188% of Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Superior Lithographics, Inc. safety composite

Superior Lithographics, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Superior Lithographics, Inc.: 7.9 → 9.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 9.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.3× in 2024

Superior Lithographics, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.9 from 7.9 in 2017 to 9.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322212 · Los Angeles, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 188% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #19/19
  • PHOTO Indiana Carton Compa…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~108 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Indiana Carton Company, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Superior Lithographics, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Superior Lithographics, Inc. averages 6.2 TCR (188% of the Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Superior Lithographics, Inc. TCR series: 2017=7.9 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=9.3 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=9.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Superior Lithographics, Inc. falls in its industry

205 Cartons, folding (except milk) establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 19 Cartons, folding (except milk) employers in California.

Superior Lithographics, Inc. (108 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Superior Lithographics, Inc.
Superior Lithographics, Inc. (108 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Superior Lithographics, Inc. has fewer employees than the Cartons, folding (except milk), made fro median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.8 8.1 11 0 0
2023 5.7 4.8 6 0 0
2022 6.2 3.5 7 0 0
2021 3.5 2.6 4 0 0
2020 9.3 8.5 6 5 0
2019 3.5 0.9 4 0 0
2018 3.5 2.6 4 0 0
2017 7.9 1.0 5 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322212 · CA · Los Angeles

205 Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Indiana Carton Company, Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jamil Packaging Corp. 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zapp Packaging, Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Randleman NC 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jazmine Ag Labor Services, Inc 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harris Farms Inc 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Superior Cattle Feeders, LLC 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rainbow Farms 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Horst Realty, LLC 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rexam Beverage Can Kent 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 2017 Manchester Housing Authority 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR S03144 - WM of Sarasota County 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Champlin 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Decko Products, LLC 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Photronics Idaho Inc. 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Lincoln Univ Plant Operations 108 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.