Substance abuse facilities, residential · Minnesota

Supportive Living Solutions - HQ

Name: Supportive Living Solutions - HQ Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

St. Paul, MN · ~78 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 0.7
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Supportive Living Solutions - HQ runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Substance abuse facilities, residential workplace, earning a grade A.

Supportive Living Solutions - HQ: 0.7 TCR = 18% of Substance abuse facilities, residential BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Supportive Living Solutions - HQ safety composite

Supportive Living Solutions - HQ scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2022→2023

Supportive Living Solutions - HQ injury rate improved

Supportive Living Solutions - HQ's TCR fell 1.4 from 1.4 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.4 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · St. Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 18% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #2/75
PHOTO Heartshare
BOOK 2y book
INJ 1 inj
SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heartshare (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

This site

0.7
Heartshare

0.7
Greenfield-5 K

0.7
Youth Town of

0.7
03-075 SAN FRA

0.7

What this shows Supportive Living Solutions - HQ averages 0.7 TCR (18% of the Substance abuse facilities, residential BLS benchmark).

Supportive Living Solutions - HQ TCR series: 2022=1.4 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Supportive Living Solutions - HQ falls in its industry

1,165 Substance abuse facilities, re establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 75 Substance abuse facilities, re employers in Minnesota.

Supportive Living Solutions - HQ (78 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Supportive Living Solutions - HQ has more employees than the Substance abuse facilities, residential median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2023	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2022	1.4	1.4	1	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · MN · St. Paul

1,165 Substance abuse facilities, residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 370 employers in St. Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Heartshare	BBROOKLYN, NY	0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Greenfield-5 Kenwood Street	GREENFIELD, MA	0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Youth Town of Tennessee, Inc.	PINSON, TN	0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	03-075 SAN FRANCISCO ARC	SAN FRANCISCO, CA	0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Austin Utilities	AUSTIN	78 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Highline Construction, Inc.	PAYNESVILLE	78 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Wireless - Wanamingo, MN	WANAMINGO	78 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Prestige Drywall inc.	ANOKA	78 FTE
CITY-NEAR	YCID	St. Paul	5,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Boston Scientific CRM	St. Paul	5,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR	United Hospital	St. Paul	3,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR	IT Campus	St. Paul	2,409 FTE
NAT-TCR	Sarica Manufacturing Company Ltd	Urbana, OH	0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	H2A Complete II, Inc.Anzualda Harvesting, Inc.	Southaven, MS	0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Micron INC. Manassas, VA	Manassas, VA	0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Mac Haik Chevrolet LTD	Houston, TX	0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Times Supermarket Royal Kunia	Waipahu, HI	78 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Groendyke Transport - Tulsa	Tulsa, OK	78 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Groendyke Transport - Houston	Channelview, TX	78 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Edison and Ford Winter Estates	Fort Myers, FL	78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.