General Medical and Surgical Hospitals · California

Sutter Valley Hospitals (30816)

Sacramento, CA · ~306 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sutter Valley Hospitals (30816) runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General Medical and Surgical Hospitals workplace, earning a grade C.

Sutter Valley Hospitals (30816): 7.2 TCR = 96% of General Medical and Surgical Hospitals BLS 7.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sutter Valley Hospitals (30816) safety composite

Sutter Valley Hospitals (30816) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2022→2023

Sutter Valley Hospitals (30816) injury rate improved

Sutter Valley Hospitals (30816)'s TCR fell 0.4 from 7.4 in 2022 to 7.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=7.4 · 2023=7.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Sacramento, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 7.2 · 96% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #386/662
  • PHOTO Piedmont Hospital
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~306 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Piedmont Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sutter Valley Hospitals (30816) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sutter Valley Hospitals (30816) averages 7.2 TCR (96% of the General Medical and Surgical Hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sutter Valley Hospitals (30816) TCR series: 2022=7.4 · 2023=7.1 · BLS 7.5

Where Sutter Valley Hospitals (30816) falls in its industry

6,862 General Medical and Surgical H establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #386 safest of 662 General Medical and Surgical H employers in California.

Sutter Valley Hospitals (30816) (306 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sutter Valley Hospitals (30816)
Sutter Valley Hospitals (30816) (306 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Sutter Valley Hospitals (30816) has fewer employees than the General Medical and Surgical Hospitals median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.1 4.3 11 2 0
2022 7.4 6.8 4 9 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · CA · Sacramento

6,862 General Medical and Surgical Hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Piedmont Hospital 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastern Idaho Regional Medical Center 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barnabas Behavioral Health 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Texas Medical Center GALTEX LLC 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Doty Bros Equipment Company dba Doty Bros Construction Company 306 FTE
STATE-SIZE A-C Electric Company 306 FTE
STATE-SIZE TransPak - DIV 110 San Jose 306 FTE
STATE-SIZE R15 APL - MENLO PARK 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Industrial Fabricators, Incorprated 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6A US Foods Grand Island 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pegasus Steel LLC. 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Baumgarten Distributing Co., Inc. 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Respite Program 306 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arc Allegany-Steuben- Shine 306 FTE
NAT-SIZE Axium New Albany Plant #1 306 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Stimulation Technologies, Inc. 306 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.