Measuring instrument repair and maintenance services · Michigan

SW Controls

Farmington Hills, MI · ~21 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SW Controls runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Measuring instrument repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade C.

SW Controls: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Measuring instrument repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SW Controls safety composite

SW Controls scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

SW Controls held a steady TCR band

SW Controls's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811219 · Farmington Hills, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P100
  • PHOTO Varian, Washington DC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Varian, Washington DC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

SW Controls in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SW Controls averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Measuring instrument repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SW Controls TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · BLS 2.1

Where SW Controls falls in its industry

56 Measuring instrument repair an establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
SW Controls (21 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 190 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate SW Controls
SW Controls (21 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 190 employees and a TCR of 1.1

SW Controls has fewer employees than the Measuring instrument repair and maintena median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811219 · MI · Farmington Hills

56 Measuring instrument repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 168 employers in Farmington Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Varian, Washington DC 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR RALEIGH HDQ 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Philips NAM CCSC Alpharetta, GA 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pharmaceutical Calibrations and Instrumentation (PCI) 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms Sturgis 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE BE Cultivation 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4605_15228 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willard DeHaan & Son Grnhs 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Centria Healthcare LLC 3,648 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2250-517 2,497 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beechview Elementary 1,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR Facilities Management 1,317 FTE
NAT-TCR GeoCare, Inc. DBA Home Instead Senior Care 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TX-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ-05 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CT-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nia Sage Home 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roses 1851 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Save-A-Lot 5000 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roses Express 650 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.