Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade · Massachusetts

Sweet Metal Finishing, Inc.

Attleboro, MA · ~21 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sweet Metal Finishing, Inc. runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade B.

Sweet Metal Finishing, Inc.: 2.2 TCR = 67% of Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sweet Metal Finishing, Inc. safety composite

Sweet Metal Finishing, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2016→2024

Sweet Metal Finishing, Inc. injury rate improved

Sweet Metal Finishing, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.7 from 4.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 191.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=191.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Attleboro, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 67% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/26
  • PHOTO Beringer Plating, Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Beringer Plating, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Sweet Metal Finishing, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sweet Metal Finishing, Inc. averages 2.2 TCR (67% of the Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sweet Metal Finishing, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=191.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Sweet Metal Finishing, Inc. falls in its industry

585 Anodizing metals and metal pro establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 26 Anodizing metals and metal pro employers in Massachusetts.

Sweet Metal Finishing, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sweet Metal Finishing, Inc.
Sweet Metal Finishing, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Sweet Metal Finishing, Inc. has fewer employees than the Anodizing metals and metal products for median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 191.4 191.4 1 0 0
2021 7.1 7.1 1 0 0
2020 5.9 5.9 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.7 4.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · MA · Attleboro

585 Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 71 employers in Attleboro, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Beringer Plating, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Surface Finish Technologies, Inc 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nobert Plating Co 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frontier Group Chino Valley 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bellingham Energy 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Medway 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Medway Power Plant 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allendale Biomass LLC 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sturdy Health Hospital 2,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sturdy Memorial Hospital 1,750 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sensata Technologies, Inc. Attleboro, MA 839 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lacerta Group, LLC - 505 Collins St. 689 FTE
NAT-TCR Rockingham 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Green Plains Mount Vernon LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Heartland Asphalt, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tmm 1338/1339/1466/1613 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tim Healey Way 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Lawrence Holdings, LLC 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE AAA Fence Inc. 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northfield South Distribution Center 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.