Materials handling machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers · Ohio

Swisslog Logistics Midwest. (E-Commerce)

Mason, OH · ~55 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Swisslog Logistics Midwest. (E-Commerce) runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Materials handling machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Swisslog Logistics Midwest. (E-Commerce): 0.0 TCR = 0% of Materials handling machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Swisslog Logistics Midwest. (E-Commerce) safety composite

Swisslog Logistics Midwest. (E-Commerce) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Swisslog Logistics Midwest. (E-Commerce) held a steady TCR band

Swisslog Logistics Midwest. (E-Commerce)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423830 · Mason, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/65
  • PHOTO Corporate
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Corporate (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Swisslog Logistics Midwest. (E-Commerce) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Swisslog Logistics Midwest. (E-Commerce) averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Materials handling machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Swisslog Logistics Midwest. (E-Commerce) TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Swisslog Logistics Midwest. (E-Commerce) falls in its industry

911 Materials handling machinery a establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 65 Materials handling machinery a employers in Ohio.

Swisslog Logistics Midwest. (E-Commerce) (55 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Swisslog Logistics Midwest. (E-Commerce)
Swisslog Logistics Midwest. (E-Commerce) (55 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Swisslog Logistics Midwest. (E-Commerce) has more employees than the Materials handling machinery and equipme median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423830 · OH · Mason

911 Materials handling machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 159 employers in Mason, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cameron 4646 W Sam Houston Parkway N 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR US TX Houston 7402 N Eldridge Pkwy/Firebrick 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOUTHERN OPERATIONS 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE IGS Solar 6100 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dolan Lab 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Backbone Power Systems LLC 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus NE Service Center 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Intelligrated Systems, LLC, dba Honeywell Intelligrated and its successors 1,036 FTE
CITY-NEAR Intelligrated Systems LLC - Installations 966 FTE
CITY-NEAR HQ & FIELD 915 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics 892 FTE
NAT-TCR Raleigh Managed Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 128 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Integration Appliance Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bessler Auto Parts 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tops #262 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tops #672 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oak Leaf Manor South 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.