Industrial molds (except steel ingot) manufacturing · Massachusetts

Synventive Molding Solutions NA

Peabody, MA · ~114 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Synventive Molding Solutions NA runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Industrial molds (except steel ingot) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Synventive Molding Solutions NA: 1.9 TCR = 58% of Industrial molds (except steel ingot) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Synventive Molding Solutions NA safety composite

Synventive Molding Solutions NA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2023

Synventive Molding Solutions NA injury rate improved

Synventive Molding Solutions NA's TCR fell 1.2 from 3.4 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333511 · Peabody, MA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Maumee Pattern Company
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maumee Pattern Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Synventive Molding Solutions NA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Synventive Molding Solutions NA averages 1.9 TCR (58% of the Industrial molds (except steel ingot) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Synventive Molding Solutions NA TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Synventive Molding Solutions NA falls in its industry

216 Industrial molds (except steel establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Industrial molds (except steel employers in Massachusetts.

Synventive Molding Solutions NA (114 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Synventive Molding Solutions NA
Synventive Molding Solutions NA (114 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Synventive Molding Solutions NA has more employees than the Industrial molds (except steel ingot) ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.1 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.2 1.1 2 0 0
2020 3.2 3.2 3 0 0
2019 3.5 1.8 4 0 0
2018 0.9 0.9 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.4 0.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333511 · MA · Peabody

216 Industrial molds (except steel ingot) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 86 employers in Peabody, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maumee Pattern Company 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Helm Tool Company 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caterpillar 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR King Machine of Charlotte 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monroe Bridge Office 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction Management & Builders, Inc. 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boston, MA HVAC 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Automated Logic Controls (New England) 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bridgewell INC 1,115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brooksby Village 823 FTE
CITY-NEAR Analogic 8 Centennial Dr Peabody MA 652 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lahey Clinic North 503 FTE
NAT-TCR HLU Services, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Providien Machining and Metals 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR YNG-ODFL 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR NEA Baptist Clinic Charitable Foundation 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Compu-Mail, LLC 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5074 U of L Jewish Frazier Hospital 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE North America : VPI East 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Engineered Materials : Fairport 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.