Insulating glass, sealed units, made from purchased glass · New York

Syracuse Glass Company

Syracuse, NY · ~104 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Syracuse Glass Company runs at 174% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Insulating glass, sealed units, made from purchased glass workplace, earning a grade D.

Syracuse Glass Company: 5.7 TCR = 174% of Insulating glass, sealed units, made from purchased glass BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Syracuse Glass Company safety composite

Syracuse Glass Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2023

Syracuse Glass Company injury rate improved

Syracuse Glass Company's TCR fell 2.4 from 6.4 in 2016 to 4.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.4 · 2017=7.0 · 2018=7.0 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=8.2 · 2023=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327215 · Syracuse, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 174% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #7/12
  • PHOTO Custom Glass Solutions
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Custom Glass Solutions (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Syracuse Glass Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Syracuse Glass Company averages 5.7 TCR (174% of the Insulating glass, sealed units, made from purchased glass BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Syracuse Glass Company TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2017=7 · 2018=7 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=8.2 · 2023=4.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Syracuse Glass Company falls in its industry

441 Insulating glass, sealed units establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 12 Insulating glass, sealed units employers in New York.

Syracuse Glass Company (104 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Syracuse Glass Company
Syracuse Glass Company (104 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Syracuse Glass Company has more employees than the Insulating glass, sealed units, made fro median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.1 2.4 5 0 0
2022 8.2 8.2 9 0 0
2021 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 6.4 3.2 5 1 0
2019 5.8 3.9 5 1 0
2018 7.0 6.0 6 1 0
2017 7.0 4.0 6 1 0
2016 6.4 3.2 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327215 · NY · Syracuse

441 Insulating glass, sealed units, made from purchased glass employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 436 employers in Syracuse, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Custom Glass Solutions 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cardinal CG - Loveland CG 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trulite - Fresno, CA 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bendheim LTD - WAYNE 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Learning Center 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE G-CNY Group LLC 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allied Power Services - Exelon, Nine Mile Point 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manning Squires Hennig Co., Inc. 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Health 4,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY 3,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center 3,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center-SJH-NY 2,803 FTE
NAT-TCR Knoxville/Lenoir City Terminal-NON DOT 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Meyer Industrial Container 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR South Plant 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Boise Consumer Cooperative 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Quivira Inc 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lantier Construction Co. 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE BHD/JV Charter Oak Bridge 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Isd 2908 Brandon-Evansville 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.