Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regulating) valves, industrial-type, manufacturing · Texas

Taprite-NWC

San Antonio, TX · ~112 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Taprite-NWC runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regulating) valves, industrial-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Taprite-NWC: 4.3 TCR = 129% of Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regulating) valves, industrial-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Taprite-NWC safety composite

Taprite-NWC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Taprite-NWC: 3.1 → 4.0 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 8.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.7× in 2023

Taprite-NWC's TCR rose 0.9 from 3.1 in 2016 to 4.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332911 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 129% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #54/59
  • PHOTO PENTAIR WATER POOL &…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~112 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PENTAIR WATER POOL & SPA INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Taprite-NWC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Taprite-NWC averages 4.3 TCR (129% of the Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regulating) valves, industrial-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Taprite-NWC TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2018=8.8 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=3 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=4 · BLS 3.3

Where Taprite-NWC falls in its industry

298 Automatic (i.e., controlling-t establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 59 Automatic (i.e., controlling-t employers in Texas.

Taprite-NWC (112 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Taprite-NWC
Taprite-NWC (112 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Taprite-NWC has more employees than the Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regul median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.0 3.0 4 0 0
2022 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2021 7.4 4.6 8 0 0
2020 3.0 3.0 3 0 0
2019 2.8 2.8 3 0 0
2018 8.8 7.7 8 0 0
2016 3.1 1.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332911 · TX · San Antonio

298 Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regulating) valves, industrial-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PENTAIR WATER POOL & SPA INC. 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hydra-Stop 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Conover Regulator Plant 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR headquarters 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bison Drilling & Field Services, LLC 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Production Fire and Safety LLC., DBA Ampro Strategic Alliance TX 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Panda Power Funds 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cattlemen 1 Solar 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Hubco Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Consolidated Electrical Distributors #5555 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Addev Materials 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Avoca Specialty Care 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Freedom Springs (seasonal establishment) 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sarracco Mechanical Waterbury 01 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jct2 - Justice Court Tucson 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sun Valley Rice, LLC 112 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.