Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing · Ohio

Technoform Bautec

Twinsburg, OH · ~53 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Technoform Bautec runs at 144% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Technoform Bautec: 4.8 TCR = 144% of Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Technoform Bautec safety composite

Technoform Bautec scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Technoform Bautec: 2.4 → 7.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 10.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.18× in 2024

Technoform Bautec's TCR rose 5.1 from 2.4 in 2016 to 7.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326121 · Twinsburg, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 144% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #15/19
  • PHOTO SWM Intl Middletown,…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SWM Intl Middletown, DE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Technoform Bautec in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Technoform Bautec averages 4.8 TCR (144% of the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Technoform Bautec TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=7.1 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=10.2 · 2024=7.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Technoform Bautec falls in its industry

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 19 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub employers in Ohio.

Technoform Bautec (53 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Technoform Bautec
Technoform Bautec (53 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Technoform Bautec has fewer employees than the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrig median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.5 5.6 4 0 0
2023 10.2 10.2 5 0 0
2022 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 6.4 2.1 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2018 4.3 4.3 3 0 0
2017 7.1 4.8 3 0 0
2016 2.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326121 · OH · Twinsburg

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 152 employers in Twinsburg, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SWM Intl Middletown, DE 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pexco Philadelphia 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Epic Plastics - Lodi 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR EVCO Plastics - Oshkosh 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Buckeye Lake, OH 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Layer Site 5 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE UTI Groveport 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canton Transmission SC 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : CLE5 1,079 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - CLE5 785 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZECL 598 FTE
CITY-NEAR TWINSBURG OH 475 FTE
NAT-TCR Morgantown 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Regency Store 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Adults and Children with Learning and Developmental Disabilities 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Armada Rubber Manufacturing Company 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Janco Industries, Inc. 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Armstrong Engineering Associates, Inc. 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sterling Spring LLC 54th 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1106 LKQ Melborne-106-Main Plant 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.