Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · Wisconsin

Tenere Metals Division Osceola

Osceola, WI · ~119 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tenere Metals Division Osceola runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Tenere Metals Division Osceola: 3.0 TCR = 89% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tenere Metals Division Osceola safety composite

Tenere Metals Division Osceola scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2021→2024

Tenere Metals Division Osceola injury rate improved

Tenere Metals Division Osceola's TCR fell 3.3 from 6.0 in 2021 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=6.0 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Osceola, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 89% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #9/53
  • PHOTO Automation Guarding …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~119 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Automation Guarding Systems (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Tenere Metals Division Osceola in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tenere Metals Division Osceola averages 3.0 TCR (89% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tenere Metals Division Osceola TCR series: 2021=6 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Tenere Metals Division Osceola falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 53 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in Wisconsin.

Tenere Metals Division Osceola (119 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tenere Metals Division Osceola
Tenere Metals Division Osceola (119 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Tenere Metals Division Osceola has more employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2023 1.5 0.7 2 0 0
2022 1.7 0.0 2 0 0
2021 6.0 0.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · WI · Osceola

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 23 employers in Osceola, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Automation Guarding Systems 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southerntier Custom Fabricators, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metal Finishing Systems Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR George Koch Sons - Evansville 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Parisi Construction LLC 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northland Electrical Services 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kerry - Rothschild 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milk Specialties Global Fond Du Lac 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osceola Manufacturing 555 FTE
CITY-NEAR Polaris Industries Osceola 424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osceola 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kapco Osceola 98 FTE
NAT-TCR 297 - Valparaiso IN 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 083 Durkin Brothers, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Landscape Services 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pioneer Frozen Foods 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Angry Peacock 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hillsboro 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town Centre 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Asw, LLC 119 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.