Coal chutes, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Metal Finishing Systems Inc.

Exton, PA · ~23 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metal Finishing Systems Inc. runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Coal chutes, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Metal Finishing Systems Inc.: 3.0 TCR = 90% of Coal chutes, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metal Finishing Systems Inc. safety composite

Metal Finishing Systems Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Metal Finishing Systems Inc.: 0.0 → 5.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.9 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2024

Metal Finishing Systems Inc.'s TCR rose 5.9 from 0.0 in 2021 to 5.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Exton, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 90% of ind

  • DART 5.9 DART
  • RANK #18/68
  • PHOTO Southerntier Custom …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Southerntier Custom Fabricators, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Metal Finishing Systems Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metal Finishing Systems Inc. averages 3.0 TCR (90% of the Coal chutes, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metal Finishing Systems Inc. TCR series: 2021=0 · 2024=5.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Metal Finishing Systems Inc. falls in its industry

1,158 Coal chutes, sheet metal (exce establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 68 Coal chutes, sheet metal (exce employers in Pennsylvania.

Metal Finishing Systems Inc. (23 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Metal Finishing Systems Inc.
Metal Finishing Systems Inc. (23 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Metal Finishing Systems Inc. has fewer employees than the Coal chutes, sheet metal (except stampin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.9 5.9 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · PA · Exton

1,158 Coal chutes, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 138 employers in Exton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Southerntier Custom Fabricators, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR George Koch Sons - Evansville 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tenere Metals Division Osceola 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Automation Guarding Systems 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mt. Parnell Fisheries Co. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hickory Run Energy, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE CPV Fairview LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. - Corporate Office 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bentley Systems, Incorporated 1,292 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Exton 531 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brian's House Inc 416 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shire: Exton 385 FTE
NAT-TCR Ward's Supermarket, Inc 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Speed Fab-Crete 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Miba Sinter USA LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR East Meadow 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Denison 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale North Loveland 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Portland Winair Co. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Duncan Aviation - Kalamazoo 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.