Hazardous waste disposal facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste · Alabama

TES Commerce Drive Facilities

Saraland, AL · ~52 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TES Commerce Drive Facilities runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hazardous waste disposal facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste workplace, earning a grade B.

TES Commerce Drive Facilities: 1.9 TCR = 73% of Hazardous waste disposal facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TES Commerce Drive Facilities safety composite

TES Commerce Drive Facilities scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2021→2022

TES Commerce Drive Facilities injury rate improved

TES Commerce Drive Facilities's TCR fell 3.8 from 3.8 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=3.8 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562211 · Saraland, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 73% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/8
  • PHOTO USE York
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: USE York (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

TES Commerce Drive Facilities in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TES Commerce Drive Facilities averages 1.9 TCR (73% of the Hazardous waste disposal facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TES Commerce Drive Facilities TCR series: 2021=3.8 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.6

Where TES Commerce Drive Facilities falls in its industry

211 Hazardous waste disposal facil establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 8 Hazardous waste disposal facil employers in Alabama.

TES Commerce Drive Facilities (52 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate TES Commerce Drive Facilities
TES Commerce Drive Facilities (52 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8

TES Commerce Drive Facilities has more employees than the Hazardous waste disposal facilities comb median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.8 1.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562211 · AL · Saraland

211 Hazardous waste disposal facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 37 employers in Saraland, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR USE York 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stericycle Environmental Solutions - Birmingham,AL 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chemical Solvents, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greensboro TSDF 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mobile Division Hillcrest 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Birmingham Division Trussville Crew Headquarters 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jasper Complex 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Patton Chapel Crew Headquarters - APC 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alorica 1,006 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1212 383 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1212 374 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC11 266 FTE
NAT-TCR TFC La Vergne Distribution Center 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 800 Fifth Avenue 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Vixen Construction, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 101781 - Dulles MetroRail (Kiewit Only) 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chattanooga - 10 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE DWD International 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pacific Drayage Services - Tracy 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE CA103 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.