Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel · Texas

Tex Tube Company

Houston, TX · ~122 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tex Tube Company runs at 125% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade D.

Tex Tube Company: 4.1 TCR = 125% of Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tex Tube Company safety composite

Tex Tube Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2023

Tex Tube Company injury rate improved

Tex Tube Company's TCR fell 2.6 from 6.9 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.9 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 125% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #31/46
  • PHOTO Tube Youngstown
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tube Youngstown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Tex Tube Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tex Tube Company averages 4.1 TCR (125% of the Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tex Tube Company TCR series: 2016=6.9 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=4.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Tex Tube Company falls in its industry

329 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, loc establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 46 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, loc employers in Texas.

Tex Tube Company (122 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tex Tube Company
Tex Tube Company (122 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Tex Tube Company has more employees than the Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.3 0.5 9 0 0
2022 2.9 1.7 5 0 0
2021 5.3 1.5 7 0 0
2020 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2019 5.5 1.8 6 0 0
2018 3.9 3.2 6 0 0
2017 3.4 1.7 4 0 0
2016 6.9 6.9 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · TX · Houston

329 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tube Youngstown 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR OKC - Star Center Tube 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alliance Tubular Holdings LLC Darlington Plant 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Republic Conduit, Inc. 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Iron Horse Tools, Inc. 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Benito SC 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lubbock Operations Center-119 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amarillo Technical Center-122 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Cleanlites Recycling 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 1108 Hanover Area School District 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Tawas Tool Company (1&2) 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR STR0539 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Snowhill Healthcare, LLC 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Genesee Street #026 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenbrier Yard 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stanley Black & Decker Miramar 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.